Thursday, March 21, 2019

Writing to Councillors in Redbridge, Barking & Dagenham and Havering regarding the cover up about King George A&E


Dear Councillors

Cover up Claim

Yesterday a group of us were outside King George Hospital for a photo shoot to say the full bid document for the failed £49M bid for acute reconfiguration at King George and Queens hospital be published immediately.

After the photo some of us went into the BHRUT board meeting to hear Cllr Dodin ask the board to publish the bid document. The board declined citing cost grounds and claimed that the £49M bid had nothing to do with closing King George A&E. No comment was made on a recent Health Service Journal article implying BHRUT was looking to pursue this £49M bid by other means, presumably by land sales.

The board statement denying the £49M bid has nothing to do with closing KGH A&E does not stand scrutiny. Acute reconfiguration of King George and Queens means closing King George A&E. There is compelling evidence that the £49M bid is for preparatory works to close King George A&E. My allegation is that the board are conducting a cover up. If the bid were published in full it would show BHRUT were planning to close King George A&E in direct contradiction to their claim to be conducting an impartial review. Once the truth of a £49M closure plan comes out, calls for the review of King George A&E to be taken out of the hands of BHRUT and put with independent experts will grow.

The easiest way for BHRUT to refute my allegation is for them to publish the bid.

The Evidence for the cover up claim

I quote from page 15 of the summary version of the Estates Strategy Plan at

This is the new plan to close King George A&E, but rather labelling it as a closure plan, two options for change are given as follows:

Current options for change

Queen’s Hospital Queen’s Hospital has one of the busiest and largest emergency departments in England, and so development at Queen’s will be focused on emergency and acute medicine, emergency surgery and acute children’s services. In addition, maternity facilities could also be expanded and developed to manage the continued growth in the number of births in north east London. To facilitate this development, the renal unit at Queens could be moved to the new St. George’s hub with non-acute care of older people, and some elective surgical services moved to King George Hospital.

King George Hospital. We aspire to develop a new centre of excellence for healthy ageing, working in collaboration with community care, primary care and social services to offer a fully integrated model of healthcare for older people. Centralising planned care will increase the use of beds and theatres. These changes, together with the adjacent Goodmayes Hospital site, create a strategic opportunity to develop a coherent masterplan for housing, education, community and primary health care, maximising land value across the two hospital sites.” (my emphasis, note no future for emergency and acute medicine at King George)

& then at page 18

“Sustainability and transformation partnership capital funding A new national £2.6bn capital fund was announced in the 2017 budget. In July 2018 STPs were invited to submit funding bids for schemes with a total value of over £100km, and schemes they aimed to deliver before 2022/23.

The Partnership submitted bids for the following projects

St Georges Hospital – a new community hub
Whipps Cross Hospital redevelopment programme management costs
St James’s Health Centre new development
Queens and King George Hospitals reconfiguration £49M
City and Hackney primary care improvements
Expansion of Queens Hospital maternity unit £14M
Children’s and Young Person’s Assessment Unit at Queen’s Hospital £8M
Barts Health Orthopaedic Centre at Newham Hospital” ENDs (my emphasis I have inserted costings obtained last month)

The three options in bold regarding reconfiguration, maternity and children all progress the so called “options” for King George & Queens and make major steps to turn them into a reality.

BHRUT have no difficulty with two of the these three bids doing what they say on the tin. The £14M maternity bid is for maternity, the £8M children bid is for children. The last bid and by the far the largest at £49M is for reconfiguration, this has always meant works to close King George A&E. For BHRUT to deny this claim is nonsense, unless they are prepared to disclose the full bid document, which they are not, a cover up is taking place.

Tonight at full council, I ask Cllr Athwal to speak at a save King George A&E meeting on the 30th March. His support on the 30th March would be very much appreciated.

It would be great if you could attend the walk from King George Hospital on the 30th March at 2pm to a meeting for 3pm at Ilford Town Hall.

Regards

Andy Walker



No comments:

Post a Comment