Thursday, April 3, 2025

Report from outside Wes Streeting's office: no to the £50M cuts

 


Many thanks to everyone attending.

The source of the cuts appears to be NHS England per the statement below taken from https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/2025-26-priorities-and-operational-planning-guidance/

I cut and paste key extracts from the  third and final paragraph is bolded and underlined.

NHS productivity also continues to improve, enabling us to deliver more care for patients. Over 2023/24, NHS providers delivered around 5% more activity year-on-year, for 0.12% more income. In the first 7 months of this year the acute sector improved productivity by over 2% – double the improvement rate pre-pandemic. The NHS is on track this year to surpass the £7 billion of efficiencies delivered in 2023/24 – achieved through innovation and reform, continuous improvement, investment in technology, data and new capacity, and better workforce retention. These steps provide the springboard for us to reimagine services as part of the 10 Year Health Plan.

But the timeliness and experience of care is still not good enough. While more people are completing treatment in A&E within 4 hours, a growing number are facing waits of 12 hours or more. In elective care – and in primary, community and mental health services – despite record activity, continued high demand means improvements are not yet nearly enough to allow everyone to access services in a timely or convenient way. And this impacts staff when they can’t provide the quality and experience of care they, and their patients, want.

In 2025/26, we are giving systems greater financial flexibility to manage constrained budgets. The government has made difficult choices to provide additional funding. While this provides effective real-terms growth in the NHS budget, it must cover final pay settlements for 2025/26, increased employer national insurance contributions, faster improvement on the elective waiting list and new treatments mandated by NICE. Overall, this means NHS organisations will need to reduce their cost base by at least 1% and achieve 4% improvement in productivity, in order to deal with demand growth. NHS England will transfer a higher proportion of funding than ever before directly to local systems and minimise ringfencing, allowing local leaders maximum flexibility to plan better and more efficient services. And, to be clear, all parts of the NHS must now live within their means.

Reflecting the Mandate from government and our evolving ways of working, we have also honed national priorities to increase local autonomy. This year’s planning guidance is more focused – setting out a small set of headline ambitions and the key enablers to support organisations to deliver them, alongside local priorities. This reflects the direction of travel towards earned autonomy for systems, with support, oversight and intervention from NHS England based on their specific needs and performance. 2025/26 is a reset moment, and it starts with the planning process – with more autonomy and flexibility comes greater responsibility and accountability.

Difficult decisions will be needed, and we must meet this collective challenge together. To balance operational priorities with the funding available, while continuing to lay foundations for future reforms, the NHS will need to reduce or stop spending on some services and functions and achieve unprecedented productivity growth in others. Open and ongoing conversations will be needed with staff, the public and stakeholders at organisation, place and system level about what it’s going to take to improve productivity, reduce waste and tackle unwarranted variation. We will back local leaders to take tough decisions, where they are clearly rooted in the needs of their populations and best use of available staff, and where all reasonable steps have been taken to maximise resources available for clinical services. Equally, we will challenge organisations who are not able to demonstrate a robust approach to prioritising patient care by bearing down on duplication and waste. 


The cuts outlined above are echoed in the March 2025 BHRUT chief executives report: Mu emphasis

Despite such recruitment – and a £9m reduction in the money spent on agency staff when compared with last year – our financial position remains very difficult. Our deficit in January was £5m worse than we had forecast, due to a reduction in the income we received, a rise in our wage bill and an increase in the money we spent on clinical supplies and drugs. As well as getting a better understanding of why our financial performance deteriorated in a way that we hadn’t anticipated, we also need to deliver at least £50m of savings in the next financial year. Doing even more with less is not a viable option. So, like many other trusts, we will have to reduce what we do to ensure we live within our means. The challenge will be to achieve this in a way that minimises, as best we can, any adverse impact on our residents.

This Mr Trainer reporting on the impact of the £50M cuts below:





The worst case is 770 jobs to go per this extract from the board papers and hence the banner:








Canvassing Redbridge & Havering Councillors to support the campaign against the £50M BHRUT budget cut

 I sent this yesterday

Dear Councillors in Redbridge & Havering

 

Per my earlier email, a substantial contraction of our NHS is planned with a £50M budget cut taking place for the next financial year for King George and Queens Hospitals. This means 770 jobs to go from a staff of 8,000. Mr Trainer, the Chief Executive for King George & Queens made this announcement at the March Barking Havering & Redbridge University Trust board meeting. 


I was outside Frimley Park Hospital in Surrey at my Facebook andywalker19 and twitter andywalker1945 yesterday reporting that that this hospital is not facing cuts. Surrey is the richest county in England, whereas Redbridge has some of the poorest wards in London. This unequal treatment of the hospitals in East London and Surrey cannot be right and it would be great if you could make the photoshoot tomorrow. The campaign against the cuts is a cross party one, with Conservative, Green, Independent, Liberal Democrat & TUSC support. 

 

A report from the photoshoot last week is at the save King George Hospital Blog. It was much appreciated to have the support of Cllr Begum and Keith Prince AM. If you cannot make the photoshoot tomorrow at Wes Streeting's office on Woodford Avenue at 7pm, but if you would to add your name to a letter to the local press please contact me. 

 

First draft of letter is:


 

Dear Letters Editor (Ilford & Romford Recorders)

We are dismayed that the Barking Havering & Redbridge University Trust (BHRUT) responsible for Queens & King George Hospitals is facing a £50M cut to its 25/26 budget which will put 770 NHS jobs at risk as disclosed at their March board meeting. It is particularly concerning that Frimley Park Hospital in Surrey, the wealthiest county in England is facing no cuts per its March Board papers. However, the BHRUT catchment area has some of the poorest wards in England. That BHRUT is being singled out for these cuts must be wrong and we call on Wes Streeting MP, the Secretary of state to intervene and stop the cuts to our local hospitals.


ENDS LETTER

 

Any Councillors and campaign supporters


 

For information in letter above: Google frimley health nhs foundation trust board meetings, to find March 7th 2025 board papers and Google BHRUT board papers, to find March 6th board papers 


 

The Chief Executive report responsible for Frimley hospital mentions no cuts, neither are cuts mentioned elsewhere in the papers. The £50M cut is mentioned in the BHRUT board papers under the Chief Executive report. I have copied in both Frimley and BHRUT communications teams should they wish to comment. 


 

Please let me know by Monday 7th April by 9am if you would like to add your name to the letter for the local press which will hopefully allow you time to check my research. 


 

Regards


 

Andy Walker